Project Type: Transmission reinforcement
Location: Aberdeenshire, Highland, Moray

Contact Details

Liaison Manager

Lesley Dow
Title: Community Liaison Manager
Telephone: 01738 455115
Mobile: 07876 837490
Address: Inveralmond House, 200 Dunkeld Road, Perth, PH1 3AQ

Land Manager

Stephen Bodie
Title: Land Manager
Telephone: 01463 728332
Mobile: 07876 836578
Address: 10 Henderson Road, Inverness, IV1 1SN
Status: Early Development

About the project

Due to increasing electrical demands on the network, major upgrades will be required between Beauly, Blackhillock, near Keith, and Kintore.

The projects are currently in the early stages of development and the project team have been consulting with landowners, members of the public and other interested parties regarding potential route corridors for new overhead lines.

For more information on the development of the project so far, please visit the 'project documents' tab of this page.

Why are these proposals being promoted?

The current transmission infrastructure has developed over many years; originally it was built to connect the demand centres that are spread around the north of Scotland and the remote multiple hydro electric power stations developed mainly in the 1950s and 60s. However, with the recent huge increase in renewable generation, in particular wind generation, the pattern of electricity supply and consumption has changed dramatically. As a consequence parts of the transmission network now need substantial upgrading as we seek to meet our Licence obligations to develop and maintain an economic, efficient and coordinated system as well as ensuring security of supply to electricity consumers.

Following detailed analysis of required system transfers and comparing this with actual network capacity, we have identified the need to reinforce the transmission network between Beauly and Blackhillock substations and between Blackhillock and Kintore substations.

The Projects’ need is reviewed by ourselves (SHE Transmission plc) and National Grid (in its role as Great Britain system operator) on an annual basis, and the anticipated timing of these Projects may change in response to changing economic signals from a range of electricity generation and demand scenarios.

This would take into account any consequences arising from changes in Government renewable energy subsidies.

The data in this map is provided for indicative purposes only and may be subject to change. Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission plc do not accept responsibility for its accuracy, completeness or validity. The data should not be copied, reproduced or utilised externally without permission.

Who is Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks?

Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks is the trading name of Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution Limited, Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission plc, Scottish Hydro Electric Power Distribution plc and Southern Electric Power Distribution plc.

How are Transmission network upgrades paid for?

Investments in projects are made by SHE Transmission plc. Electricity transmission companies are authorised to recover the costs of such investments through 'use of system' charges which are levied by National Grid Electricity Transmission plc on generators and suppliers of electricity. Suppliers recover their costs from all electricity customers. In order to protect the interests of customers, the transmission companies have to demonstrate to the energy regulator, Ofgem (Office for Gas and Electricity Markets) that proposed investments are necessary, are efficient and are economical so that the charges which are ultimately levied on all electricity customers are justified.
This means SHE Transmission is subject to a funding mechanism established by Parliament and regulated by Ofgem. Cross subsidies between different businesses in the SSE group is not permitted.

How are our proposals scrutinised?

The Scottish Ministers are responsible for determination of applications submitted under Section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989. Both statutory consultees and members of the public have the right to submit their representations on the application. All representations will be considered by Scottish Ministers in their determination of the application.
The Office for Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem), as the regulator, has to approve all investment so project proposals are developed under license conditions.
Preferred route corridors chosen will comply with revised ‘Holford Rules’ which are the recognised industry approach to routeing overhead lines amended to reflect Scottish circumstances.

What are The Holford Rules?

The Holford Rules originated in 1959 as the result of work by Lord Holford, a part-time member of the Central Electricity Generating Board (National Grid's predecessor). The Holford Rules have been augmented by both National Grid and SHE Transmission plc to reflect environmental legislation and best practice in recent years. We have continued to use them as a valuable set of guidelines for reducing the impact of our assets on landscapes.
The guidance recommends appropriate application of the Holford Rules to inform routeing. These rules advocate the application of a hierarchical approach to routeing which first avoids major areas of highest amenity, then smaller areas of high amenity, and finally considers factors such as backdrop, woodland and orientation. The Holford Rules apply the term ‘amenity’ to refer to environmental designations and classifications such as Natura 2000 sites, Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), Scheduled Monuments, Listed Buildings, National Parks.
The guidance also recognises that the key effect of overhead lines is visual and it advises that the routeing of overhead lines should consider the types of mitigation (screening) that could offset any visual effects.
In their National Policy Statement EN-5, the Government has stated that the Holford Rules “should be followed by developers when designing their proposals.” Their use is therefore Government policy, rather than a voluntary choice of SHE Transmission plc.

How and to what extent are electricity consumers' interests considered?

We are regulated by the Office for Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem), the regulator responsible for representing consumers' interests. Electricity consumer interests are therefore one of our key drivers and this is enshrined in our statutory duties under the Electricity Act.
In particular we have a statutory duty to develop, maintain and operate an efficient, economic and co-ordinated transmission system. Since the costs of these projects will ultimately be paid for by electricity consumers, we have a responsibility to take cost into account with due weighting in a comparison against other important factors.

What is the transmission network?

It’s the highest voltage electricity network in the UK – the ‘motorway network’ of the energy world. It transmits large quantities of electricity over long distances via wires carried on a system of mainly metal towers (pylons) and large substations. Transmission voltages in Scotland are 132kV, 275kV and 400kV. Larger generation schemes usually connect to the Transmission system.

The lower voltage parts of the system are called distribution networks. In Scotland, these local networks operate below 132kV whereas in England the distribution network includes 132kV. 

Why are proposals for reinforcement of the electricity network between Beauly, Blackhillock and Kintore being promoted?

The current transmission infrastructure has developed over many years; originally it was built to connect the demand centres that are spread around the north of Scotland and the remote multiple hydro electric power stations developed mainly in the 1950s and 60s. However, with the recent huge increase in renewable generation, in particular wind generation, the pattern of electricity supply and consumption has changed dramatically. As a consequence parts of the transmission network now need substantial upgrading as we seek to meet our Licence obligations to develop and maintain an economic, efficient and coordinated system as well as ensuring security of supply to electricity consumers.
Following detailed analysis of required system transfers and comparing this with actual network capacity, we have identified the need to reinforce the transmission network between Beauly and Blackhillock substations and between Blackhillock and Kintore substations.
The Projects’ need is reviewed by ourselves and National Grid (in its role as Great Britain system operator) on an annual basis, and the anticipated timing of these Projects may change in response to changing economic signals from a range of electricity generation and demand scenarios. This would take into account any consequences arising from changes in Government renewable energy subsidies.

What other options have been considered?

A range of options were identified for the Projects which considered the available technology and covered geographic locations which allowed a connection to the three identified substations. The boundaries of the study area were defined as follows:-

  • The northern boundary is formed by the Moray Firth coastline, from Beauly as far east as Portgordon, to the north of Blackhillock substation, as well as an area to the east of Huntly.
  • The eastern boundary is located approximately 10 km east of a direct line between Blackhillock and Kintore substations, in order to allow full consideration of this area;
  • The southern boundary is formed by the boundary of the Cairngorms National Park, as well as the location of site options for a new substation at Tomatin.
  • The western boundary is formed by the existing Beauly substation and Loch Ness, as well as the area along the western side of Loch Ness.

The options identified were appraised in terms of technical, environmental and cost factors. The options considered were as follows:

  • Option 1 Upgrade of existing infrastructure between Beauly, Blackhillock and Kintore to operate at 400kV;
  • Option 2 Construction of a marine cable link for part of the route between Beauly and Blackhillock, as well as a new/upgraded overhead line to Blackhillock and Kintore;
  • Option 3 Construction of a new onshore AC underground cable between the connection points;
  • Option 4 Construction of a new onshore HVDC link incorporating underground cable between the connection points;
  • Option 5 Construction of a new double-circuit 400kV overhead line, in combination with upgrades to existing infrastructure; or
  • Option 6 Construction of a new double-circuit 400kV overhead line for the entire length of the connection.

In the first instance, technical assessments were made, to review the engineering feasibility of these potential options.
Environmental studies identified the most sensitive environmental features within the areas under consideration. Potential effects on nature conservation designations as well as effects on people, communities and the economy were highlighted.
Finally, costs were considered in order to assess the financial impact of each option. A key requirement for us is to provide an economic, efficient and coordinated solution. Regard has to be had to not only the total cost of construction/installation, but also the lifetime operation and maintenance costs.

This appraisal of the various options concluded that the following two options were appropriate to progress to the next stage of analysis:

  • Option 5 Construction of a new double-circuit 400kV overhead line, in combination with upgrades to existing infrastructure; or
  • Option 6 Construction of a new double-circuit 400kV overhead line for the entire length of the connection.

As a result of further analysis, the options appraisal determined that the option to be developed will comprise a new 400kV overhead line connection, mounted on steel lattice towers of a typical height of 50 m and an anticipated average span length of 250-300 m.

What is the final scope of the Projects to be promoted by SHE Transmission plc?

The projects being promoted to reinforce the transmission network comprise a 400kV overhead electricity line between the existing substations at Beauly and Blackhillock and a 400kV overhead electricity line between the existing substations at Blackhillock and Kintore. The overhead electricity lines will be supported by steel lattice towers.
These projects will deliver important transmission infrastructure within the overall National Main Interconnected Transmission System (MITS). The MITS must remain secure and stable for all credible planned and unplanned events including unexpected fault events and loss of generation. As a consequence novel and unproven solutions cannot be considered.

Why have some of the options not been progressed?

An explanation of the reasons for Options 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 not being progressed can be provided as follows:-

Option 1 Upgrade of existing infrastructure between Beauly, Blackhillock and Kintore to operate at 400kV

The existing 132 kV overhead lines between Beauly and Blackhillock cannot be upgraded to operate at 275kV or 400kV as the towers cannot support the required size of conductors.
The existing 275kV overhead line between Beauly and Blackhillock is not suitable for 400kV operation and has already been upgraded using the largest conductor that could be accommodated on the existing tower suite. This infrastructure is therefore at the capacity limit of what can be provided.
There are two existing 275 kV overhead lines between Blackhillock and Kintore; one is constructed at 400kV and is capable of operating at 400 kV so will be uprated in the future. The other is a 275kV tower design and cannot be uprated to 400kV operation. Both must be retained for security and capacity reasons.
The transmission system Security and Quality of Supply Standards (SQSS) require that there is sufficient capacity in the transmission network to allow for credible faults and subsequent circuit trips. Consequently the number of circuits in an area can be just as important as the capacity of the circuits.
Therefore, taking account of the tower construction, circuit capacity and number of circuits in this area, it is not technically feasible to connect the three substations with a 400kV line by means of upgrading existing infrastructure. Therefore this option was not progressed.

Option 2 Construction of a marine cable link for part of the route between Beauly and Blackhillock, as well as new/upgraded overhead line to Blackhillock and Kintore

The Beauly Firth is designated as a Special Protection Area (SPA), a Special Area of Conservation (SAC), a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Ramsar site, while the Inner Moray Firth is designated as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC).
These environmental factors mean that a marine cable link from Beauly is unlikely to be a favourable option to statutory consultees.
A subsea cable option from the Black Isle to the Moray coast was also considered but this would have to cross the Moray Firth SAC and therefore is unlikely to be a favourable option to statutory consultees.
In addition to the environmental constraints the installation of a 400kV subsea cable is not technically feasible since it is not a proven technology at that voltage. The highest voltage subsea cables with any reliable service history operate at 220kV. Therefore, a 220kV subsea cable link would have to be used. This would require 400/220 kV transformers at each landfall location, which would have a nominal footprint of at least 100 m x 100 m. Due to the capacity limits on these subsea cables which are significantly less than an overhead line, there would be a requirement for multiple 220kV cables per circuit to match the rating of the overhead line.
As a medium to high cost option, combined with engineering constraints and high consenting risk, these options were not progressed.

Option 3 Construction of a new onshore AC underground cable between the connection points

Long lengths of 400 kV AC cable suffer from high capacitive charging current which limits the real power transfer through the cable. Significant reactive compensation equipment at both ends and at locations along the route would be required i.e. additional substation compounds. This option carries a very high technical risk and is unlikely to be technically viable due to potentially severe issues with harmonic magnification, low frequency resonance and voltage instability.
A new underground cable would require a far greater land take than an overhead line during installation. It may have adverse impacts on peatland, groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems (GWDTEs) and hydrology. Key receptors would be likely to include the following designated sites: River Spey SAC; River Findhorn SAC. This is a high cost option.
This option was not progressed on technical, environmental and cost considerations.

Option 4 Construction of a new onshore HVDC underground cable between the connection points

An HVDC link could be installed between the connection points using the same HVDC technology that is proposed for the Caithness – Moray, Western Isles and Shetland projects. This technology has a capacity restriction of 1200 Megawatts (MW) which means that it would have significantly less capacity compared to the overhead line solution. The link would require an HVDC converter station at each end of the link (footprint approx. 170 m x 90 m x 17 m high). To increase the capacity to better match the overhead line capacity, two HVDC links could be installed, however this would require two converters at each end. HVDC underground cables would require a greater land take than an overhead line during installation and it may have adverse impacts on peatland, groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems (GWDTEs) and hydrology. Key receptors would be likely to include the following designated sites: River Spey SAC; River Findhorn SAC. This is a high cost option.
This option was not progressed on technical, environmental and cost considerations.

Other HVDC technologies with higher capacities are available, but these have larger, more expensive, converter stations and cables so were not progressed.

Option 5 Construction of a new double-circuit 400 kV overhead line, in combination with upgrades to existing infrastructure

Further investigations confirmed that as with Option 1 above, the existing overhead lines are not suitable for 400 kV operation or the number of circuits in a corridor required to be increased.

Why is a 400 kV line required?

In Scotland, electricity transmission lines can be built at 132 kV, 275 kV or 400 kV. The need for reinforcement is demonstrated through application of the Planning Standards against different generation and demand scenarios and also through economic assessment of constrained energy as a result of congestion on the existing and post reinforced network. To accommodate the level of generation connections over the next few years, we have determined that the capacity required necessitates the use of a 400 kV overhead line. As it happens, the size of the towers would be similar for a new 275 kV or 400 kV line. 

How much will the Projects cost?

The Final cost of the Projects will depend on a number of factors including the route chosen, the tower design required, the scale and scope of any public road improvements required, access requirements, mitigation measures that may be required and the terms of any consent conditions that may have a cost impact.  All costs will have to be justified to Ofgem but at this stage are expected to be several hundred million pounds.

How do we consult on our proposals?

For projects of this scale and complexity we consult with the public as soon as it is relevant and meaningful to do so. At the beginning of project development, the focus is on ensuring electrical connection and security of supply. Once broad geographical areas that could be affected by the proposals are established, statutory stakeholders are consulted to seek their initial feedback on the Projects. The Scottish Government Local Energy and Consents chair these statutory stakeholder meetings due to the geographical spread. As broad areas are still under consideration, at this stage, it is difficult for us to give any definitive information about which communities may or may not be affected, therefore, it is not until a preferred route corridor is identified, that full public consultation begins. As a responsible developer we understands the value of effective consultation and further public and statutory consultation will be undertaken at various points in the development of the Projects.

How were the consultation events publicised?

A broad range of media were used to ensure as many people as possible were made aware of the consultations being undertaken so they could access the information and take part in local events or make their representations to the project team. The range included the use of social media, broadcast on local and regional radio stations and advertisements in regional, local and farming newspapers. In addition, posters were displayed on community notice boards, in local shops and post offices and provided to local community councils to display. For the Monymusk consultation in March 2016, letters were also sent directly to 935 households in the area.
Information about the consultation events being held and a Consultation document were posted on the project websites, public information booklets were issued at the events, and we sought input from the consultation events by way of a feedback form to be completed by those interested in the Projects.
It is considered that the methods employed to advertise the consultation events and seek feedback were appropriate to the stage that the Projects were at but we will take account of representations made in feedback forms as to how events and consultations can be best publicised in the future.

What are the timescale for the delivery of the Projects?

For the last two years, alongside our environmental consultants, we have been working to identify a corridor within which a new overhead line could be routed.
In October 2015 a corridor of least constraint was identified. This corridor is several kilometres wide in places and less than one kilometre in others. The corridor width is determined by high level constraints, for example, environmental designations, cultural heritage assets, built environment constraints, topography and terrain, existing infrastructure and large areas of population. The corridor identified still has some constraints within it and these will be assessed as work progresses to define a preferred route alignment within the corridor.
Between October 2015 and January 2016 we consulted on a preferred corridor. Feedback during that consultation suggested a narrow area between Monymusk and Kintore should be considered as well. A further consultation event was then held between March and May 2016 in the Monymusk area showing the extended width to the preferred corridor in the area suggested.
For the remainder of 2016 and the first half of 2017, the project team will focus on the preferred corridor, incorporating feedback received where possible, to narrow down to a preferred route. During this period we will be engaging with statutory and non statutory consultees to ensure the process is robust and consistent and will also be contacting potentially affected landowners and occupiers during this period.
When a preferred route has been identified in late 2017 we will hold further public events to consult on the preferred route. This will involve the preparation of a Consultation Document prior to the events and a Report on Consultation after the events.
It is expected that an application under Section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 to construct and operate the line, will be submitted to the Scottish Government Local Energy and Consents in 2019, but that will be subject to National Grid and Ofgem review. Once we have submitted our application, comments and representations can be sent to the Scottish Government Local Energy and Consents.
On our current timetable, it is anticipated to begin construction in 2021.
The dates given and shown in the graphic below are indicative at this stage and subject to regular review. We will liaise with all communities and stakeholders throughout the Projects.

 

 

Will the new lines be close to any properties?

Minimising as far as possible the impact of the lines on the visual amenity of the area from Beauly to Blackhillock and Kintore will be one of the critical factors in identifying the proposed route alignment. Another key objective will be to try to avoid proximity to as many residential properties as possible. When designing the route of a high voltage overhead line we endeavour to align the route so as to stay at least 100 m from houses, however, this may not be possible in some situations. Detailed analysis will be undertaken as part of the route selection and the project team will then be in a position to demonstrate what, if any, impact there would be on properties.  In developing the route alignment, we will aim to ensure that landscape features are used to either screen or provide backclothing for the towers and lines in views from residential properties, to minimise impacts on visual amenity. 

Why is the proposed line not taking the most direct route?

The most direct route between Blackhillock and Kintore would be a straight line that would pass very close to Bennachie and also the Hill of Foundland further to the north-west.
The option of passing on the north side of these landmarks has been considered, but this would involve a corridor either north-east or south-west of the existing overhead lines.
Going south-west of the existing overhead lines would involve passing closer to Bennachie and on higher ground, which we have tried to avoid due to its landscape and amenity value.
On balance of human, environmental, technical and economic factors, we believes the proposed corridor offers a shorter and less constrained route than options to the north-east of the existing overhead lines.

Why is an underground cable solution not being considered?

The widespread use of transmission cables as an alternative to overhead lines is not a feasible way forward from a technical standpoint as there are potentially severe technical issues with harmonic magnification, low frequency resonance and voltage stability which are likely to make the system inoperable.
Overhead lines are a standard, well established technology that has many advantages. The technology is not outdated as modern higher tensile steel allows slimmer tower designs; while significant advances in conductor technology allow higher capacities to be carried on new and existing towers. Overhead lines form the majority of new and existing electricity transmission infrastructure around the world.
Furthermore, overhead lines are still the most economical way of transmitting electricity between two points. Newer technologies are sometimes unproven and commonly cost significantly more to construct and operate with a shorter life span.
Although there are some countries in the world that are proposing undergrounding as a default for new infrastructure (for example, Denmark) a different regulatory regime is in place, with different economic drivers and objectives. World wide, there is very little undergrouding of the 400 kV network. Where undergrounding is pursued, there will be technical challenges of cable charging current, voltage and network stability which increase with increased voltage and circuit length.
Our approach seeks to ensure that a full process of consultation and appraisal is followed to strike a balance between the needs of many different stakeholders.

Why can’t the new lines be built alongside the existing line?

Existing lines were routed using similar criteria to those being used today to avoid designated features, minimise impacts on people, take account of engineering constraints, topography, watercourses, land use and existing infrastructure. If an overhead electricity line already exists that does not imply that a new line can be constructed beside it without impacting on, or being impacted by, those same features. The existing lines may have taken the only route through a particular area to avoid constraints so in some cases there may be no room for additional infrastructure.
For the Beauly-Blackhillock Project, the existing 275 kV line forms the northern boundary of the preferred corridor so it is possible that the new and existing line could be adjacent in places.
For the Blackhillock-Kintore Project a new corridor has been identified with fewer constraints than the existing route.

Why can’t the new lines be undergrounded alongside the A96?

The existing A96 is routed through and adjacent to towns and villages and as such that is not a practical consideration.
It would be difficult to underground the required number of cables next the new A96 as our cables require the same width as a dual carriageway. This could mean houses and other infrastructure would be adversely affected (e.g. more houses would need to be removed. An overhead line would also encounter similar issues with existing housing etc.
Also see the question “Why have some of the options not been progressed”option 3.

What will the overhead line look like?

We have consulted at an early stage on these Projects. As a result, specific images are not available at present, given that the project development is at the stage of assessing a preferred corridor and not specific route alignments.
The choice of tower type will be determined by the topography and altitude of the route of the proposed line and the associated wind and ice loadings. Depending on the type of standard tower selected, the height of the towers will be 46 m or 50 m. The towers need to be high enough to maintain statutory electrical safety clearance to ground for 400 kV lines of 7.6 m and a minimum distance between conductors to ensure adequate separation.
The 46 m towers are similar in height and dimensions to those supporting the existing transmission lines between Kintore, Peterhead and Blackhillock and the Kintore to Kincardine line. The 50 m towers would be similar to the Beauly to Denny line standard towers.

Can alternative tower designs be used to limit the visual intrusion of towers?

We are committed to investigating all appropriate mitigation techniques in order to reduce the potential impact of overhead lines. This mitigation may include alternative tower designs.  Both SHE Transmission plc and National Grid are developing alternative tower designs but these are in the very early stages of development. These new designs may be suitable for these Projects, however, rigorous testing and assessments have to be carried out before a decision can be taken as to whether they could be used on these Projects.

Can overhead lines with greater capacity be used in order to reduce the need for additional lines?

In all cases, we seek to minimise the need for additional infrastructure, by making better use of the existing network and designing for future capacity. The relevant sections of the existing network will have been upgraded to its maximum capacity before these Projects will be built. The new line will be built to 400 kV capability to give additional capacity.
The transmission system Security and Quality of Supply Standards require that there is sufficient capacity in the transmission network to allow for credible faults and subsequent circuit trips. Consequently the number of circuits in an area can be just as important as the capacity of the circuits.

Are there incentives for us to place overhead lines underground?

Ofgem have allocated £500M for the Transmission Operators in Great Britain (Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission plc, Scottish Power Energy Networks & National Grid) to bid for funding to mitigate the visual impact of existing transmission equipment in National Parks and National Scenic Areas. This could include location specific undergrounding, enhanced screening or some other mitigation. We will bid for some of this funding for existing lines.
The Incentive only applies to existing transmission infrastructure in National Parks and National Scenic Areas and not to transmission lines that are under development.

Can energy generation and transmission be planned together so the need for high-voltage lines stretching across the country from generators to consumers is minimised.

We have a duty is to ensure new generation is connected to the transmission grid. We do not influence where generation is located.  

Are the Projects needed if wind farms/ micro hydro/solar projects have stopped due to the change in the subsidy regime?

We have an obligation to respond to the demand for connections that are contracted or forecasted to connect. The generation market is volatile so kept under annual review. If a development has a contracted connection date we must work to that date until the developer modifies its connection application or withdraws it. For these Projects SHE Transmission plc and National Grid are monitoring the activities and progress of many renewable developments including onshore and offshore wind, hydro, pumped storage, wave, tidal, solar and existing generating plant that may increase or decrease their contracted output in the north and north-east of Scotland.
These Projects are also required to increase system security of the national transmission network and comply with the requirements of the National Electricity Transmission System Security and Quality of Supply Standards (NETS SQSS).
A review of the needs case will be undertaken annually under the Network Options Assessment (NOA) during the Projects’ development by SHE Transmission plc and National Grid and if it is found that the demand is no longer there the Projects will be put on hold until the generation background position changes.

What environmental studies will be undertaken?

Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) will be completed for the Projects and submitted in the form of an Environmental Statement (ES) to accompany the Section 37 application to the Scottish Government Local Energy and Consents for approval.  These assessments will include a number of surveys, which will be set out within the ES. The ES will also describe any proposed mitigation measures agreed with statutory bodies such as Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Environment Protection Agency and Historic Environment Scotland. The topics that will be assessed as part of the EIA will include land use, forestry, agriculture and sporting interests, geology and soils, hydrology, ecology, birds, landscape and visual effects, cultural heritage and archaeology, tourism and recreation, electric and magnetic fields and noise, as applicable. 

How will wildlife be protected?

Surveys will be conducted as the Projects develop so that all wildlife, including protected species which may be potentially affected, are identified and can be protected.  This will be undertaken as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment, which will be required to support the application for consent to the Scottish Government Local Energy and Consents. 

Will the Projects affect private water supplies?

Discussions will be held with landowners and surveys completed during development of the Projects to locate private water supplies. The outcome of these surveys and subsequent assessment will be documented in the Environmental Statements and supplied to the contractor to protect water supplies.

Will the Projects pollute the local river/burn?

Mitigation will be put in place to ensure local rivers and burns are not adversely affected.  This mitigation will be defined as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment process, and the specific measures that are required will be documented in the Environmental Statements.

Are there any potential impacts on archaeology or cultural heritage?

Cultural heritage surveys will be conducted as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment process, to ensure that known archaeology is understood and assessed.  Any mitigation measures will be agreed with Historic Environment Scotland and local authority archaeological services for the Projects which will include what to do if any unknown archaeology is discovered during construction. The next stage of the Projects will include more detailed assessments of the setting for sensitive cultural heritage receptors. The outcome of the archaeology and cultural heritage surveys and assessment will be documented in the Environmental Statements. 

What will the impact be on ancient or semi-natural designated woodland areas?

Once the route alignment is known we will be able to consider fully the impact of the proposals on ancient or semi-natural designated woodland areas. We will aim to avoid these areas wherever possible during the detailed route selection process. If that cannot be achieved we will work with landowners to provide suitable mitigation.

What about the impact of the proposed overhead lines on ecology?

Ecology surveys and assessment will be undertaken as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment to ensure that all of the vegetation, plants, birds and protected species (both terrestrial and aquatic) which may be potentially affected are identified and can be protected. No significant long term adverse ecological effects are likely to arise as a result of erecting or operating the new transmission line. This is partly because, where potentially significant effects are identified, mitigation and off-set measures will be implemented. The surveys and assessment will be documented in the Environmental Statements, which will be required to support the consent applications.

Have tourism interests been considered?

We are always careful to minimise any impact on tourist attractions and early consultation will assist in identifying any concerns.
We will also look carefully at what impact construction might have during key events in local areas with the aim of minimising any inconvenience. Any potential impact on tourism interests will be assessed through the Environmental Impact Assessment and will be documented in the Environmental Statements.

Will SHE Transmission plc ensure that landscapes not designated as NSAs, SSSIs, National Parks or similar are not being ignored in the routeing process?

It is accepted that national designations do not, in themselves, represent the full extent of valued or sensitive landscapes to be taken into consideration. Accordingly, we have considered landscapes identified by local designations (e.g. Special Landscape Areas in the Highlands, Areas of Great Landscape Value in Moray and candidate special landscape areas of Aberdeenshire) as well as non-designated landscape types.

Will the new line encroach on any National Scenic Areas?

The proposed route corridor for the Projects does not encroach on any National Scenic Areas.

Is the route of the line between Beauly and Blackhillock going through Culloden Battlefield?

The preferred route corridor is situated over 2 km to the south of Culloden Battlefield and further away than existing overhead line infrastructure in the area. The preferred route alignment has not yet been identified, however, we are fully aware of the importance of minimising impacts on Culloden Battlefield. At this stage, it cannot be confirmed that there will be no visibility of the overhead line from the battlefield at all but any such impact will be fully considered as part of the detailed route alignment process and any mitigation required will be considered to ensure the cultural and historic importance of the battlefield is not significantly affected by the proposals.

Have Electric and Magnetic Fields been considered?

We are obliged as part of its licence obligations, to ensure that its assets operate within the guidance set by the UK Government.
Electric and magnetic fields (EMF) will be considered as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment process to ensure that the Projects will be well within limits set by UK government guidance which in turn is based on the advice of the Government’s independent scientific advisers, the NRPB (now part of the Health Protection Agency), who ensures the appropriate level of protection for the public from these fields.

Further information on the guidance can be accessed on the UK government website, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/electromagnetic-fields

The NRPB keeps the results of EMF health studies under constant review to ensure that the guidelines for limiting exposure are based on the best available scientific information.

Additional information on the research into a possible link between electromagnetic fields generated from electricity transmission infrastructure and human health is documented in the Energy Networks Association (2013) publication Electric and Magnetic Fields.

What does the construction work involve and how long will the lines take to build?

At this stage, construction timetables are not known and so an accurate timescale cannot be provided, but by way of example, the Beauly to Denny line which is 220 km took four years to construct.

The Projects consists of installing a double circuit 400 kV overhead transmission line from Beauly to Blackhillock, approximately 110 km, and from Blackhillock to Kintore, approximately 55 km. Existing substations will be utilised so no additional substations are planned as part of these Projects.

The construction of an overhead electricity line follows a standard sequence of events. The first stage is enabling works which includes public road improvements and any required tree cutting, improving existing access tracks and constructing new access tracks where required. Until the final alignment of the route is know we cannot say where these tracks might be required, and whether they will be required on a permanent or temporary basis.

Thereafter tower foundations will be installed and towers erected. On completion of that, the conductors (wires) will be strung. Once the towers are erected, the ground around the towers will be reinstated and ground cover will be allowed to regenerate naturally.

Reinstatement plans for any ground affected by the works would be agreed with statutory authorities ahead of works being started. We will work with landowners and communities to try and improve access for the long term, wherever possible.

We will complete reinstatement works as soon as appropriate after completion of construction of the line and will monitor these for a period of time to ensure that they have been successful.

How will we work in designated environmental areas?

We will identify and assess designated environmental areas as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment and will produce detailed Environmental Management Plans which will be adhered to at all times during construction. They will be formulated in consultation with the construction contractor and statutory consultees such as the local authorities, Scottish Natural Heritage and Scottish Environmental Protection Agency.

How will construction traffic be managed?

Prior to the start of construction, we will agree Traffic Management Plans with the relevant local authorities and road space managers, including the police. These plans will detail works which may be required to upgrade or strengthen public roads to ensure their suitability for use. The Traffic Management Plans will also detail the routes to be used by construction traffic and anticipated volumes of traffic and any required mitigation measures. By undertaking these assessments, we aims to ensure that construction traffic uses the roads safely and that any inconvenience to the public is kept to a minimum whilst maintaining a safe environment for the workforce and all other road users.

Will all public rights of way continue to be accessible?

Where construction access tracks coincide with rights of way we will ensure the access tracks are built in such a way that walkers and other users can still use the facilities. Signs will be erected to warn the public of construction activities and construction staff will be made aware of their responsibilities to ensure minimum disruption to the public.

How will we avoid gas pipelines, quarries, wind turbines and other infrastructure?

During the detailed routeing process we will contact and work with owners of existing infrastructure, businesses and landowners within the preferred corridor.

What impact will there be on agricultural land?

Assessment of effects on agriculture and land use, as well as further liaison with landowners, will be undertaken as part of the detailed route selection and subsequent Environmental Impact Assessment process, prior to a consent application being submitted. We seeks to work with landowners to ensure that disruption is minimised during construction.

Will construction works be noisy or dirty?

There is potential for short term noise and dust impact during construction, however, we will ensure our contractors follow best practice to mitigate any effects to keep both to a minimum.

Will there be power cuts during construction?

Where construction works require parts of the transmission network to be temporarily removed from service, we will agree these with National Grid, who control the operation of the Great Britain transmission system. These should not affect customers due to the nature of the interconnected transmission system. Where local shut downs are planned at lower distribution voltages, endeavour will be made to minimise these and affected parties will be notified.

Will community benefit be paid?

We are a regulated business and are not permitted to pay community benefit due to project costs being met by electricity customers across Great Britain. All project costs have to be approved in advance by Ofgem, the electricity industry regulator. However, we may require to carry out some improvements to local infrastructure as part of the project delivery.
There are indirect, but tangible benefits which arise during the construction of these projects. It was assessed that the construction of the Beauly – Denny project contributed over £100m to the Scottish economy. The project had a direct impact by providing business to local companies, using local accommodation and supporting local businesses.

Will compensation be paid if construction of the lines impacts on businesses?

No compensation is payable but we will do everything we can to keep disruption to a minimum during construction.

Will I get compensation if SHE Transmission plc infrastructure is on my land?

Compensation will be paid to landowners on whose land the line is to be erected on and that will be agreed on a case by case basis in line with statutory provisions.

Will the Projects create local jobs?

As part of the process for submitting the application for consent under section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 we have to estimate the number of jobs that the Projects may create. Experience in other areas is that many jobs are created as a result of the demand for staff by contractors and their sub contractors and are generally filled by local people. There are many additional jobs created in ancillary industries.

The construction of the overhead line from Beauly to Denny supported over 1500 full time jobs throughout peak periods. Whilst many of these roles were specialised, employment opportunities were created for those willing to learn new skills, join apprentice programmes or to put existing skills into new practices.

The SSE group operates a programme called “Open for Business” where individual businesses, large and small, can register to be considered for work. As far as individuals are concerned, opportunities might arise with the main contractor or their sub-contractors but we are not in a position to say who that will be at this stage. You can sign up for Open for Business on line at https://www.sseopen4business-highlands.com/sse/signup.html

How do I have my say?

Further rounds of consultation will be held once the route alignment has been identified and that consultation process will provide an opportunity to make representations and highlight concerns and these will be considered along with other comments. The consultation process will be widely advertised and events will be held along the route of the line.
Once an application for consent under Section 37 is submitted to the Scottish Government Local Energy and Consents, it will be advertised in the press and opportunities for submission of representations will be available at that time.

BBKRouteCorridorImage.jpg

Proposed route corridor confirmed for Beauly-Blackhillock-Kintore transmission reinforcements

We have published our Route Corridor Selection Report for the proposed reinforcement of the transmission network between Beauly, Blackhillock and Kintore. Please visit the 'Project Documents' tab to view the Route Corridor Study Report.

Route corridor consultation

The deadline for providing comments on the Route Corridor consultation stage closed on 6 May 2016. We would like to thank everyone who has provided feedback and comments in relation to the projects.

Document downloads

Proposed Route Corridor

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A1

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A2

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A3

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A4

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A5

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A6

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A7

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A8
File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex A9

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex H1

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex H2

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex H3

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Route Corridor Study Report Annex H4

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement, Blackhillock - Kintore Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 09 Nov 2016
Report on Consultation - August 2016
File Type: pdf
Published: 03 Sep 2016
Report on Consultation - August 2016: Annexes
File Type: pdf
Published: 03 Sep 2016
Frequently asked questions
1360

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Consultation document (Consultation Report)
1366

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Consultation summary booklet
1365

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Consultation document - additional information
1364

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Environmental constraints map 9 March 2016
1362

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Briefing document for Monymusk event 9 March 2016
1361

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Preferred route corridor amendment 9 March 2016
1363

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Public consultation events
1369

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016
Exhibition boards October 15
1367

Related Projects: Beauly - Blackhillock Reinforcement

File Type: pdf
Published: 18 Aug 2016

Local People

Lesley Dow
  • Title: Community Liaison Manager
  • Email: lesley.dow@sse.com
  • Telephone: 01738 455115
  • Mobile: 07876 837490
  • Address: Inveralmond House, 200 Dunkeld Road, Perth, PH1 3AQ

Sign up for project updates

Keep informed with all that's happening on this project